+91-9958 726825
A comparative study of employee’s idea of D&I initiatives in startups and corporates and its impact on innovation
Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) initiatives have emerged as essential components for organizations striving to remain competitive, innovative, and resilient in today's global business environment. These initiatives not only foster a sense of belonging and equity among employees but also serve as catalysts for creativity and innovation by integrating diverse perspectives into organizational processes. However, while the value of D&I is widely acknowledged, significant disparities exist in how startups and corporates design, implement and perceive these initiatives. Often characterized by limited resources, informal structures, and a culture of rapid experimentation, startups may approach D&I with flexibility and adaptability. Conversely, with their established and formal processes, corporates tend to employ well-defined and strategic D&I frameworks.
This study investigates these differences by exploring the initiatives of D&I in startups and corporates, examining employee perceptions of the effectiveness of these initiatives, and assessing their impact on organizational innovation. By comparing the unique challenges and opportunities faced by both organizational types, the research provides actionable insights into how tailored D&I practices can enhance innovation and business outcomes in diverse contexts. The findings contribute to the broader understanding of how organizational culture, structure, and resources influence the effectiveness of D&I initiatives. |
Pain Text:
Ms. Varsha D, Dr. Elizabeth Chacko (2025), A comparative study of employee’s idea of D&I initiatives in startups and corporates and its impact on innovation. Samvakti Journal of Research in Business Management, 6(1) 418 - 442.
Ms. Varsha D, Dr. Elizabeth Chacko (2025), A comparative study of employee’s idea of D&I initiatives in startups and corporates and its impact on innovation. Samvakti Journal of Research in Business Management, 6(1) 418 - 442.